Day 1 :
Keynote Forum
David Berkow
Ulster University, UK
Keynote: Peripheral Refraction-Yes or No!
Time : 09:35-10:00
Biography:
Abstract:
Peripheral Refraction-Yes or No!
Keynote Forum
Ingrid Kreissig
Heidelberg University, Germany
Keynote: Primary retinal detachment: How to treat it best?
Time : 09:00-09:35
Biography:
Abstract:
- Neuro Optometry | Glaucoma | Ocular Diseases | Lenses
Location: Edinburgh
Chair
Carolyn Carman
University of Houston, USA
Session Introduction
Mark Wright
Royal College of Surgeons, Scotland
Title: Quiz on Diagnostics Eye Algorithms
Biography:
Abstract:
Clifford D Brown
Central Alabama Veterans Healthcare System, USA
Title: Observations in a population with diffuse traumatic brain injury
Biography:
Abstract:
Carolyn Carman
University of Houston, USA
Title: Useful clinical pearls for assessing and managing visual impairment in brain injury patients
Biography:
Abstract:
Chikezie Grand Ihesiulor and Udo A Ubani
University of Manchester, Uinted Kingdom and Abia State University Uturu, Nigeria
Title: Molecular basis of congenital glaucoma
Biography:
Abstract:
Biography:
Abstract:
Purpose: To compare the clinical outcome of visual acuities and spectacle independency of four different multifocal intraocular lenses (MFIOLs) (ReZoom, Tecnis, Acrysof Restor SN60D3, and Acrysof Restor SN6AD1) based on information reported in the international literature and to investigate a potential follow up treatment.
Methods: Comparative clinical trials that involved bilateral implanting MFIOLs in patients with cataract were extracted from the literature. Clinical outcomes included uncorrected distance visual acuity, binocular distance corrected visual acuity, uncorrected intermediate visual acuity, binocular distance corrected intermediate visual acuity, uncorrected near visual acuity, binocular distance corrected near visual acuity and spectacle independency. All visual acuity declarations were transformed in LogMAR if needed. The statistical results are based on mean visual acuities ±SE.
Results: Six papers were identified describing four MFIOLs (ReZoom, Tecnis, Acrysof Restor SN60D3, and Acrysof Restor SN6AD1). UCDVA was 0.09±0.04, 0.10±0.01, 0.15 ±0.01 and 0.05 ±0.03 LogMAR. The spherical Acrysof Restor SN60D3 had the poorest result. The best result was performed by the Acrysof Restor SN6AD1. BDCVA was 0.06 ±0.01, 0.02 ±0.01, 0.08 ±0.01 and 0.03 ±0.01 LogMAR. UCIVA was 0.10±0.04, 0.22±0.00, 0.22 ±0.00 and 0.16 ±0.01 LogMAR. Tecnis and Acrysof Restor SN60D1 had the worst results, while the best result was performed by the ReZoom. BDCIVA was 0.10±0.04, 0.21±0.00, 0.30 ±0.00 and 0.17±0.02 LogMAR. Even here, the results from Tecnis and Acrysof Restor SN60D3 were inferior compared to the other MFIOLs. The UCNVA in 40 cm was 0.26±0.03, 0.14±0.01, 0.15±0.03 and 0.09±0.04 LogMAR. Best result was performed by the Acrysof Restor SN6AD1; the worst outcome was by ReZoom. BDCNVA in 40 cm was 0.20±0.02, 0.09 ±0.04, 0.13 ±0.04 and 0.05±0.05 LogMAR. The statements from the UCNVA are transmittable. The UCNVA in 33 cm was 0.30±0.00, 0.01±0.01, 0.18 ±0.00 and 0.18±0.00 LogMAR. The difference between the ReZoom and the Tecnis is disproportionate. While the Tecnis has invincible outcome, the performance of the ReZoom is poor in this distant. BDCNVA in 33 cm was 0.31±0.00, 0.12±0.00, 0.15±0.00 and 0.15±0.00 LogMAR. The spectacle independence rate was highest in the Acrysof Restor SN6AD1 group, followed by the Acrysof Restor SN60D3 group. The worst results were in the ReZoom group.
Conclusion: All MFIOLs provide a good uncorrected and binocular distance corrected visual acuity. In the intermediate area the ReZoom has the best result. The performance of the Acrysof Restor SN60D3 is poorest for this distance. In the near area, the ReZoom has the worst results in 40 cm and 33 cm. The Tecnis has the best performance in the distance of 33cm. The Acrysof Restor SN6AD1 and the Acrysof Restor SN60D3 have higher spectacle independency rates compared with the other multifocal IOLs. A complete spectacle independency was mostly not reached by any type of MFIOL.
Pamela J Miller
Southern California College of Optometry, USA
Title: Is there still a place for the primary care optometrist?
Biography:
Abstract:
Sanil Joseph
Aravind Eye Care System, India
Title: Prevalence and risk factors for myopia and hyperopia in an adult population in southern India
Time : 13:55-14:20
Biography:
Abstract:
Thokozile Ingrid Metsing
University of Johannesburg, South Africa
Title: Comparison of the Snellen acuity chart with the spectrum eye care software LogMAR chart amongst children of school going age
Biography:
Abstract:
Julia Pulliam and Angelina F. Bonner
St.Louis Healthcare System, USA and VA Illiana Health Care System, USA
Title: Challenges Beyond the Phoropter: Part I Neuro-Eye Symposium
Biography:
Abstract:
Silvia Gamboa Saavedra
Centro de OftalmologÃa Bonafonte, Spain
Title: Prevalence estimates for myopia in children and young people in 2013–2017
Biography:
Abstract:
- Neuro Optometry | Glaucoma | Ocular Diseases | Lenses
Location: Edinburgh
Chair
Nicholas Gidosh
Michigan College Of Optometry, USA
Session Introduction
Julia Pulliam and Angelina F. Bonner
St.Louis Healthcare System, USA and VA Illiana Health Care System, USA
Title: Challenges beyond the phoropter: Part II retina/OCT symposium
Biography:
Abstract:
Joseph Hallak and Jeffrey Becker
State University Of New York, USA and Pennsylvania State University, USA
Title: Neuro-optometric rehabilitation of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury (mTBI)
Biography:
Abstract:
Nicholas Gidosh
Lehigh Valley Eye Care Associates, USA
Title: Toric orthokeratology contact lenses for patients with corneal elevation differences
Biography:
Abstract:
Alejandra Mendivelso Suárez
Universidad de la Salle, Colombia
Title: Ocular burning-smartphone and symptoms in university students
Biography:
Abstract:
Aditi Chinmay Deshpande
Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, India
Title: Amblyopia And Its Management With Vision Therapy Program
Time : 12:40-13:05
Biography:
Aditi Chinmay Deshpande MOptom., FAAO, FIACLE—is working as an Assistant Professor at Bharati Vidyapeeth Deemed University, School of Optometry, Pune, India. She specializes in Binocular Vision and Orthoptics predominantly, and practices Low Vision at private eye hospital in Pune. She has presented paper at the American Academy of Optometry (AAO) in 2012 and has facilitated workshops on Binocular Vision in popular national and international optometry conferences.
Abstract:
Statement of the Problem: Amblyopia is a developmental disorder resulting from anomalous binocular visual input early in life in the absence of visible ocular or visual pathway disease caused by an uncorrected refractive error, strabismus or form and light sense deprivation. Those with amblyopia may suffer from poor visual acuity, poor special acuity, and low sensitivity to contrast, impaired stereoacuity and abnormal binocular summation. In children, undetected and untreated amblyopia may preclude children’s visual development and impair productive participation in society.
Purpose: To assess the course of amblyopia treated with vision therapy exercises in children.
Method: A total of 50 subjects ageing from 3–11 years were enrolled in this hospital based study. All the subjects had undergone preliminary eye examination to rule out various types of amblyopia. The visual acuity measured with Snellen’s Visual Acuity chart and stereo-acuity measured with TNO test were compared, for the amblyopic subjects before and after giving vision therapy exercises along with patching at three months, six months and nine months of follow-ups, respectively using statistical analysis.
Results: Of the 50 subjects examined, 15 were having strabismic amblyopia and 35, refractive amblyopia. The mean visual acuity of strabismic amblyopic subjects was 0.38 before treatment and was found to be clinically significant after treatment (0.54), but showed no statistically significant difference. Similarly, clinically significant difference was found between mean visual acuity of uniocular and binocular refractive amblyopic subjects compared before and after treatment. There was statistically significant difference found between stereoacuity measured before treatment and after treatment in subjects with refractive (p=0.001) and strabismic (p=<0.001) type of amblyopia.
Conclusion: This study proved that vision therapy exercises were effective treatment therapy in subjects with refractive and strabismic amblyopia which showed significant improvement in visual acuity and stereoacuity.
Recent Publications
- Chinmay Deshpande, Dipti Amod Gogate and Aditi Deshpande (2017) The functional impact of amblyopia on visual skills in children. Delhi Journal of Ophthalmology 28(2):26–31.
Evan J. Kaufman
University of Virginia, USA
Title: Ocular graft-versus-host disease and treatment with scleral contact lenses
Biography:
Abstract:
Jason Chin
Andover Eye Associates, USA
Title: Ophthalmic clinical trials: a global perspective and how to incorporate them into your practice
Biography:
Jason Chin is a graduate of McGill University and he received his Optometry Degree from the New England College of Optometry in 2004, where he also completed his Cornea and Contact Lens Residency in 2005 and was awarded the American Optometric Foundation's "Dr. George Mertz Contact Lens Residency Award". He primarily sees patients in a private practice setting but is also a Clinical Investigator for Ora, Inc. and an Investigator/Consultant for national clinical trials on contact lenses for various contact lens companies around the US. His main area of interest and expertise are in Specialty Contact Lenses and Clinical Research. He is a Fellow of the American Academy of Optometry in the Cornea and Contact Lens Section, and is Board Certified and a Diplomat of the American Board of Optometry.
Abstract:
Clinical trials are an important entity for the advancement of medicine. At any given time, anywhere around the globe, a clinical trial is occurring and new advancements are being made. As optometrist and providers of eye care, we should be involved in this to further help the advancement of our field and specialty. This talk will give a global perspective and give some overview of the different clinical trials occurring around the world in the field of optometry and ophthalmology. An overview will be discussed on what the particular focuses are for various regions of the world; whether it be pharmaceutically based, disease detection, disease prevention, disease treatment or disease elimination and how the research may impact our field. Many of these issues are ones that we encounter and deal with, every day in our practice. This talk will also discuss some of the benefits of incorporating clinical trials into your practice and briefly review things to consider when incorporating them into your practice.
Jason Chin
Andover Eye Associates, USA
Title: Ophthalmic clinical trials: A global perspective and how to incorporate them into your practice
Biography:
Abstract:
Saleha Al-atawi
Cardiff University, UK
Title: Internal lens structure changes during simulated accommodation
Biography:
Abstract:
David Richards
USF Eye Institute, USA
Title: Importance of initial and serial gonioscopy in the management on narrow-angle glaucoma
Biography:
David W Richards is an Associate Professor of Ophthalmology (Retired), University of South Florida, Tampa, and holds a Diploma from American Board of Ophthalmology, Fellow in Glaucoma, Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miami. He has 30 years’ of experience as a Clinical and Surgical Glaucoma Specialist. He has a particular interest in the dissemination of useful clinical information to the optometry community. He has lectured for several years at the Inter American University of Puerto Rico, School of Optometry in Bayamon.
Abstract:
Statement of the Problem: There is a common misconception among ophthalmologists and optometrists that a patent laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) is a permanent cure for narrow angle glaucoma.
Discussion: In fact, the AC angle can progress to complete synechial closure and uncontrolled intraocular pressure despite a patent LPI. The most common risk factors for this process are: Hyperopia, phacomorphic lens changes and plateau iris syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment consist of: serial gonioscopy; OCT of the AC angle; laser iridoplasty, and in some cases, lens extraction even in eyes with little or no lens opacification. Examples of clinical cases will be discussed.
Recent Publications
Chen B H, Drucker M D, Louis K M and Richards DW (2016) Progression of normal-tension glaucoma after
- ventriculoperiotoneal shunt to decrease cerebrospinal fluid pressure. J Glaucoma. 25 (1): e50-e52.
- Lovelace RVE and Richards DW (2013) On the dispersion measure of high-redshift synchrotron sources. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 433 (3): 2275-2277.
- Potcoava MC, Kay CN, Kim MK and Richards DW (2009) In vitro imaging of ophthalmic tissue by digital interference holography. Journal of Modern Optics. 57 (2): 115-123.
- Ayyala RS, Zurakowski D, Monshizadeh R, Hong C-H, Richards D, Layden WE, Hutchinson BT and Bellows AR (2002) Comparison of double-plate Molteno and Ahmed glaucoma valve in patients with advanced uncontrolled glaucoma. Ophthalmic Surgery Lasers and Imaging Retina. 33 (2): 94-101.
Julia Pulliam and Angelina F. Bonner
St.Louis Healthcare System, USA and VA Illiana Health Care System, USA
Title: Challenges beyond the phoropter: Part III anterior segment
Biography:
Abstract:
John A Patterson
St. Vincent’s School for Sensory Impairment, UK
Title: Social capital, human capital and flight paths to opportunity and employment for visually impaired
Biography:
Abstract:
Shroug M. Aldaham
Ministry of Education, Saudi Arabia